Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41028593›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

Novel Method for Rapid Screening of Chickpea for Combined Dry Root Rot Disease and Osmotic Stress.

Shubhashish Ranjan, Chaitali Narendra Chavan, Muthappa Senthil-Kumar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shubhashish RanjanBRIC-National Institute of Plant Genome Research, New Delhi, India.
Chaitali Narendra ChavanBRIC-National Institute of Plant Genome Research, New Delhi, India.
Muthappa Senthil-KumarBRIC-National Institute of Plant Genome Research, New Delhi, India. skmuthappa@nipgr.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), confronts substantial challenges from the emerging pathogenic fungus Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid, causing dry root rot (DRR) disease. Chickpea plants severely affected by combined DRR and drought stress. Currently sick plot and sick pot method are utilized for germplasm screening to identify tolerant genotypes. These methods are time-consuming; therefore, we propose a novel methodology for the rapid screening of chickpea under combined DRR and osmotic stress conditions. This chapter introduces an adept high-throughput phenotyping methodology, conducted within controlled laboratory conditions, aiming to investigate the interaction between osmotic stress and DRR disease in chickpea crops. The methodology employs an innovative pouch technique for screening combined stress, providing a streamlined temporal investigation process and precise control over stress parameters. The incorporation of polyethylene glycol (PEG) enables the simultaneous imposition of osmotic stress alongside pathogen infection, making the methodology versatile for studying combined stress scenarios. This approach fills a gap in concurrent stress imposition techniques, enhancing germplasm screening by identifying genotypes with varying susceptibility and resistance levels. Thus, we suggest use of high-throughput phenotyping in combination genome-wide association study (GWAS) can take combined stress resistance breeding in chickpea at next level to combat food security and climate change.

Indexed as

AscomycotaCicerPlant DiseasesDisease ResistanceHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysOsmotic PressurePlant BreedingPlant RootsPolyethylene GlycolsSeedsPolyethylene GlycolsChickpeaCombined DRR osmotic stress phenotypingDRRGWAS and Macrophomina phaseolina

Identifiers

PMID41028593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.