Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41028551›Full record

ArticleJournal of religion and health2026

YouTube and Religion during COVID-19: Analyzing Indonesian Islamic Groups' Narratives.

Achmad Sulfikar, Martin Tanis, Peter Kerkhof

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of religion and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Achmad SulfikarDepartment of Communication Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. a.s.sulfikar@vu.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1005-3782
Martin TanisDepartment of Communication Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Peter KerkhofDepartment of Communication Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The surge in COVID-19 cases in early 2020 led to the Indonesian government imposing restrictions on public services and religious activities, making YouTube a crucial platform for disseminating pandemic-related information by religious groups. This study examines Indonesian Islamic groups' perspectives on COVID-19 and their use of YouTube. We analyzed the 40 most viewed COVID-19-related YouTube videos from moderate and fundamentalist groups between January and September 2020. The research focused on Islamic groups' beliefs about the pandemic's causes, responses to government policies, and recommendations for dealing with COVID-19. The results showed moderate group videos had more views but fewer social interactions than fundamentalist group videos. Distinct differences were observed, particularly in reactions to government policies, which faced more criticism from fundamentalist videos. Fundamentalist videos portrayed COVID-19 as divine punishment and advocated for an Islamic state as a solution, while moderate groups depicted the pandemic as a test from God and promoted adherence to health guidelines and prayer.

Indexed as

COVID-19IslamSocial MediaHumansIndonesiaInformation DisseminationSARS-CoV-2Social GroupAdvocacyCovid-19Online religionSocial mediaYouTube

Identifiers

PMID41028551
PMCPMC13481419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.