ArticleSpinal cord2025
Physiotherapy interventions for the respiratory management of people with spinal cord injury: recommendations from an Australian and New Zealand clinical practice guideline.
Article in Spinal cord, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designDevelopment of respiratory recommendations in a Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG).
objectives(i) To describe the evidence recommendations and consensus-based opinion statements for the effectiveness of respiratory interventions to improve respiratory muscle strength, lung volumes and secretion clearance. (ii) To outline the clinical rationale for these recommendations and statements.
settingAustralia and New Zealand
methodsSixteen clinical questions relating to respiratory interventions for people with spinal cord injury (SCI) were presented in PICO format (Participant, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) and decided a-priori by a respiratory guideline committee. Systematic reviews were conducted to answer each of the questions using rigorous methodology to synthesise evidence from randomised controlled trials. Evidence was assessed for risk of bias and quality using Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Details were presented to a guideline panel who voted on each question and developed either an evidence recommendation or a consensus-based opinion statement.
resultsEighteen randomised controlled trials met the inclusion criteria and were relevant for eight questions. Three of these trials had interventions and outcomes relevant to more than one question. Overall, ten, eight and two trials answered questions related to improving respiratory muscle strength, lung volumes and secretion clearance, respectively.
conclusionThe Australian and New Zealand CPGs for the physiotherapy management of people with SCI ( www.sciptguide.com ) provide evidence recommendations and consensus-based opinion statements to inform respiratory management of people with SCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.