Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41028542›Full record

GuidelineNature medicine2025

A consensus blood transcriptomic framework for sepsis.

Brendon P Scicluna, Kiki Cano-Gamez, Katie L Burnham, Emma E Davenport, Andrew Reese Moore, Soumen Khan, Charles J Hinds, Olaf L Cremer, Purvesh Khatri, Timothy E Sweeney and 2 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Nature medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00131196 unknown statusnot on this map

Functional Genomic Influences on Disease Progression and Outcome in Sepsis Due to Pneumonia or Peritonitis

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of OxfordRan2005 to 2017Enrolled4,000ConditionsPneumonia, Peritonitis
NCT01905033 unknown statusnot on this map

Molecular Diagnosis and Risk Stratification of Sepsis

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorAcademisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)Ran2011 to 2018Enrolled7,500ConditionsSepsis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Dengue virus infection.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Critical illness expands a transcriptionally distinct hypometabolic CD8bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Brendon P SciclunaDepartment of Applied Biomedical Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Mater Dei hospital, University of Malta, Msida, Malta. brendon.scicluna@um.edu.mt.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2826-0341
Kiki Cano-GamezCentre for Human Genetics, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Katie L BurnhamWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8680-2933
Emma E DavenportWellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK.
Andrew Reese MooreDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8040-2576
Soumen KhanCentre for Human Genetics, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6012-2232
Charles J HindsWilliam Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5094-8324
Olaf L CremerDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4264-1108
Purvesh KhatriInstitute for Immunity, Transplantation and Infection, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4143-4708
Timothy E SweeneyInflammatix Inc., Burlingame, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3596-1093
Julian C KnightCentre for Human Genetics, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0377-5536
Tom van der PollCentre of Infection & Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9199-5079

Funding

Center for Translational Molecular Medicine (CTMM) 04I-201RCUK | Medical Research Council (MRC) MR/V002503/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust (Wellcome) 204969/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis is a life-threatening condition driven by a maladaptive host response to infection. To establish a standardized blood transcriptomic subtype model, we aggregated blood transcriptomics data from two major sepsis cohorts: the Molecular Diagnosis and Risk Stratification of Sepsis (MARS) project (n = 678 sampled on intensive care unit admission; ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT01905033 ) and the Genomic Advances in Sepsis (GAinS) study (n = 444 sampled on intensive care unit admission and n = 817 follow-up samples; ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT00131196 ). We demonstrate a strong interconnection across three separate classification methods, resulting in the proposed groupings of three consensus transcriptomic subtypes (CTSs). The distinguishing characteristics of CTS1 included gene activation of typical inflammatory pathways, more pronounced endothelial activation and an overall immature neutrophil theme. CTS2 was characterized by gene activation of a heme metabolism pathway, fibrinolytic disturbances and platelet and eosinophil signatures. CTS3 was associated with genes involved in the activation of allograft rejection, interferon signaling and anticoagulation functions, together with lymphocyte and nonclassical monocyte features. Evaluating CTS classification in independent patient cohorts, specifically the vasopressin vs noradrenaline as initial therapy in septic shock (VANISH) randomized controlled trial (n = 176; ISRCTN registration no. ISRCTN20769191 ) and patients hospitalized with suspected sepsis at a district hospital in Uganda (n = 128), ascertained the robustness of our approach. Notably, post hoc analysis of a pseudo-randomized cohort, along with a reanalysis of the VANISH trial data, unmasked a harmful signal in CTS2-assigned patients treated with corticosteroids. The CTS classification method aligns diverse sepsis transcriptomic subgroupings into a robust, reproducible framework, thereby enabling biological interpretation and potentially assisting aspects of clinical trial design to advance precision medicine in sepsis.

Indexed as

SepsisTranscriptomeAdultAgedConsensusFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicObservational Studies as Topic

Identifiers

PMID41028542
PMCPMC12705454

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.