Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41028538›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Intelligent pear variety classification models based on Bayesian optimization for deep learning and its interpretability analysis.

Tao Lu, Fanqianhui Yu, Yanting Yu, Linlin Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tao LuSchool of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao, 266520, China.
Fanqianhui YuHaide College, Ocean University of China, Qingdao, 266100, China. fanqianhuiyu@outlook.com.
Yanting YuInstitute of Oceanographic Instrumentation, Shandong Academy of Sciences/Qilu University of Technology, Qingdao, 266100, China.
Linlin ZhangQingdao MingDe Environmental Protection Instrument Co., Ltd., Qingdao, 266000, China.

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2023M742156Key Lab of Industrial Fluid Energy Conservation and Pollution Control (Qingdao University of Technology), Ministry of Education key project fundingLaoshan Laboratory Science and Technology Innovation Project 2021WHZZB0304National Natural Science Foundation of China 52205109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate classification of pear varieties is crucial for enhancing agricultural efficiency and ensuring consumer satisfaction. In this study, Bayesian optimized (BO) deep learning is utilized to identify and classify nine types of pears from 43,200 images. On two challenging datasets with different intensities of added Gaussian white noise, Bayesian optimization automatically searched for the optimal hyperparameters and identified two optimal models, whose classification performance was objectively evaluated. The results indicate that dataset configuration significantly impacts classification outcomes. The optimal model A achieved an accuracy of 97.29% on dataset A (training-to-testing ratio = 21:10), while the optimal model B achieved an accuracy of 90.39% on dataset B (training-to-testing ratio = 1:10). This study also explored the impact of different proportions of validation sets within the training set on the performance of the optimal models. Additionally, on the original Fruit360 dataset, the accuracy of the BO optimal model reached 100% (training-to-testing ratio = 12:5). Furthermore, feature visualization, strongest activations, and local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (LIME) techniques were used to demonstrate the optimal models' understanding of pear images with noise and to reveal how and why the models make classification decisions. In summary, this study's dataset configuration is closer to real agricultural applications, and BO deep learning addresses the challenge of manually finding optimal hyperparameters for CNNs in agricultural applications, the interpretability methods enhance the transparency and reliability of CNN-based models. These laying the foundation for the widespread application of deep learning methods in agriculture.

Indexed as

Deep LearningFruitPyrusBayes TheoremBayesian optimisationDeep learningModel interpretabilityPear varietiesVisualization methods

Identifiers

PMID41028538
PMCPMC12485015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.