ArticleJournal of applied genetics2025
Bioinformatics and machine learning reveal novel prognostic biomarkers in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Article in Journal of applied genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), the seventh most common cancer worldwide, has become more closely linked to poor lifestyle habits. Despite improvements in cancer treatment approaches, patients with stage I-II HNSCC have a 70-90% 5-year survival rate, and for patients with advanced stages III-IV, this rate falls to about 40%. This controversy is all about the heterogeneity of HNSCC. Finding diagnosis and prognosis biomarkers has the potential to make significant improvements in the life expectancy and overall health of these patients. The combination of bioinformatics and machine learning has facilitated the finding of the best markers for HNSCC. In this regard, RNA expression data were obtained to identify genes that were expressed differently (DEGs) and utilize a deep learning algorithm to identify genes that exhibited significant variability. In addition, correlations between clinical data and DEGs, the building of a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, and the prediction of tumor-infiltrating immune cells were analyzed. Deep learning analysis identified diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers strongly associated with carcinogenesis, such as KRT33B, KRTAP3-3, C14orf34, and ACADM. In addition, after analyzing the ROC curve, it was found that the combination of ACADM, KRT33B, and C14orf34 is the most practical combination of diagnostic markers. This combination achieved sensitivity, specificity, and Area Under the Curve (AUC) values of 0.92, 0.86, and 0.93, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41028529What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.