Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41028525›Full record

ArticlePain and therapy2025

VER-01 Shows Enhanced Gastrointestinal Tolerability, Superior Pain Relief, and Improved Sleep Quality Compared to Opioids in Treating Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Phase 3 Clinical Trial.

Winfried Meissner, Charles Argoff, Sabine Sator, Volker Schoder, Matthias Karst

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pain and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05610813 (Multicentre, Randomized, Open-label Study to Prove an Additional Benefit of the Full-spectrum Cannabis Extract VER-01 Over Opioids in the Treatment of Patients With Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05610813 phase3completednot on this map

Multicentre, Randomized, Open-label Study to Prove an Additional Benefit of the Full-spectrum Cannabis Extract VER-01 Over Opioids in the Treatment of Patients With Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorVertanical GmbHRan2023 to 2024Enrolled384ConditionsChronic Non-specific Low Back PainArmsVER-01, Opioid therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. From controversy to clinical evidence: the evolving role of cannabis in pain therapy.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Winfried MeissnerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, 07747, Jena, Germany.
Charles ArgoffAlbany Medical Center, Albany, NY, 12208, USA.
Sabine SatorClinical Department for Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Volker SchoderMetronomia Clinical Research GmbH, Paul-Gerhardt-Allee 42, 81245, Munich, Germany.
Matthias KarstDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Pain Clinic, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany. karst.matthias@mh-hannover.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3502-0023

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChronic low back pain (CLBP) affects over half a billion people worldwide. Current pharmacologic treatments, comprising mainly non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids, offer limited efficacy and pose significant risks, warranting the development of tolerable, safe and effective alternatives.

methodsThis randomized controlled trial on adults with CLBP was designed to confirm the superior efficacy and gastrointestinal tolerability of VER-01, a novel, standardized full-spectrum extract from Cannabis sativa DKJ127 L., over opioids. Subjects were randomized (1:1) to receive VER-01 or a range of commercially available opioids. After a 3-week titration, subjects underwent 24 weeks of treatment, followed by 2 weeks of wash-out. The primary endpoint was the relative risk of constipation occurrence after 27 weeks treatment. Secondary endpoints included changes in pain and sleep scores, determined using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS), with key secondary endpoints defined for week 27.

resultsA total of 384 individuals were randomized to receive VER-01 (n = 192) or opioids (n = 192). Subjects receiving VER-01 were fourfold less likely to develop constipation than those receiving opioids (relative risk [RR] VER-01/opioids 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.09-0.69; p = 0.007) and threefold less likely to use laxatives (RR 0.34; 95% CI 0.18-0.65; p < 0.001). Longitudinal analysis revealed that VER-01 was superior to opioids in terms of pain reduction over 6 months of treatment, although differences in secondary endpoints limited to week 27 alone were not significant. Throughout the 6 months of treatment, mean pain reduction was 2.50 NRS points with VER-01 versus 2.16 with opioids (mean difference [MD] 0.34; 95% CI 0.00-0.67; p = 0.048), and sleep improved by 2.52 points with VER-01 versus 2.07 with opioids (MD 0.45; 95% CI 0.11-0.79; p = 0.009). These benefits were particularly pronounced in participants with severe pain, with greater pain reduction (MD 0.58; 95% CI 0.01-1.15) and sleep improvement (MD 0.66, 95% CI 0.05-1.27) compared to opioids.

conclusionsVER-01 demonstrated superiority over opioids in treating CLBP, both in terms of efficacy and gastrointestinal tolerability.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05610813; EudraCT ID: 2022-001358-41.

Indexed as

CannabisChronic painConstipationOpioid-induced constipationOpioidsSleepTHCVER-01Vertanical

Identifiers

PMID41028525
PMCPMC12634985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.