ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2026
Impact of urinary extravasation in posterior urethral valves: clinical implications of urinomas and ascites on kidney function.
Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Overview of pseudo-acute kidney injury.Renal failure · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUrinary extravasation (UE) in patients with posterior urethral valves (PUV), in the form of urinomas or urinary ascites, is thought to represent a pop-off mechanism. Previous literature has proposed a kidney protective mechanism, although this remains controversial. Here, we performed a matched comparison to assess the effect of UE on kidney outcomes.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed our PUV database, including all patients diagnosed < 3 months of age with at least 1-year follow-up. We collected demographics, management, vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) status, and kidney function parameters. UE was defined as postnatal urinoma or urinary ascites. We performed both unadjusted and propensity-matched comparisons of patients with and without UE. Matching was used to balance age, diversion status, urinary tract infection history, presence of VUR, and nadir creatinine. The primary outcomes were 1-, 3-, and 5-year kidney outcomes.
resultsOf the 138 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 27 (20%) had UE (23 urinoma, 4 urinary ascites). The median age at presentation was 5 days. Six patients (26%) required percutaneous drainage, and the median time to resolution was 21 days. Patients with UE had significantly higher initial creatinine levels but no difference in nadir values. Of those with available data, 18 (18%) and 10 (14%) had chronic kidney disease (CKD) at 3 and 5 years. Overall, there was no difference in 3- and 5-year rates of CKD between patients with and without a history of UE.
conclusionsIn a matched comparison, UE was not associated with long-term adverse or beneficial effects on kidney function. This study provides further evidence that the presence of UE may not be a relevant prognostic factor in children with PUV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41028498What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.