Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41028433›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

Characterization of Transgenic Cotton Plants by Northern Blotting.

Janani Sree Sivakumar, Selvi Chellamuthu, Sakthi Ambothi Rathnasamy, Vasanth Krishnan, Dhandapani Gurusamy

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Janani Sree SivakumarDepartment of Botany, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Selvi ChellamuthuDepartment of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sakthi Ambothi RathnasamyDepartment of Plant Biotechnology, Centre of Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology (CPMBB), Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Vasanth KrishnanDepartment of Botany, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Dhandapani GurusamyDepartment of Botany, Kongunadu Arts and Science College (Autonomous), Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. gdhandapani@kongunaducollege.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The main intent of northern blotting is an essential strategy in molecular biology to quantify the particular messenger RNA (mRNA). The very initial step is to identify the cells that express a specific gene, therefore providing a better understanding regarding the physiological role of the protein that has been encoded. Understanding the nutritional, hormonal, or environmental factors which governed by a particular gene is the primary aim of measuring mRNA. In addition to identifying transcript presence, it also provides size and a comparative analysis for transcript abundance over the single membrane. It's been effectively adapted in recent years to investigate and validate the expression in addition to size of short noncoding RNA. The denaturing agarose/polyacrylamide gel should be used to segregate RNA based on their size before it can be transferred on the solid surface in a way that maintains the topology distribution of the gel for the purpose of preparing northern blot to hybridization. This chapter clearly emphasizes the step-by-step protocol for northern blotting.

Indexed as

Blotting, NorthernGossypiumPlants, Genetically ModifiedRNA, MessengerRNA, PlantRNA, MessengerRNA, PlantAutoradiographyHybridizationmRNANorthern blottingTransgenic cotton

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.