Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41028404›Full record

SynthesisClinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society2025

Improvement in nocturnal blood pressure with bedtime antihypertensive administration in older adults aged 65 and above: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jordy Saren, Siddhartha Lieten, Mirko Petrovic, Esma Islamaj, Ivan Bautmans, Aziz Debain

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jordy SarenGeriatrics Department, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-1455-7658
Siddhartha LietenGeriatrics Department, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8825-8764
Mirko PetrovicDepartment of Internal Medicine and Paediatrics, Section of Geriatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7506-8646
Esma IslamajDepartment of Electronics and Informatics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7437-5716
Ivan BautmansGeriatrics Department, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6820-9586
Aziz DebainGeriatrics Department, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium. Aziz.Debain@uzbrussel.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5752-6498

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study evaluated the effectiveness of morning versus bedtime antihypertensive medication administration in reducing ambulatory blood pressure (BP) in older adults aged ≥ 65, and to assess whether administration timing influences conversion from a non-dipper to a dipper BP profile.

methodsEight randomized controlled trials were identified through systematically screening of the PubMed and Web of Science databases. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Meta-analyses were conducted with Review Manager version 5.4 to compare the efficacy of morning versus bedtime administration on ambulatory BP indices.

resultsBedtime administration resulted in significantly greater reductions in nocturnal systolic BP (mean difference [MD] - 4.52 mmHg, [lower and upper 95% confidence intervals [CI] - 7.15; - 1.90]; p = 0.0007) and diastolic BP (MD - 2.00 mmHg, [95% CI - 2.90; - 1.10]; p < 0.0001). No significant differences were observed in diurnal systolic BP (MD 1.28 mmHg, [95% CI - 0.17; 2.72]; p = 0.08), diastolic BP (MD 0.34 mmHg, [95% CI - 0.49; 1.16]; p = 0.42), 24/48-h systolic BP (MD - 0.02 mmHg, [95% CI - 1.37; 1.33]; p = 0.98), or 24/48-h diastolic BP (MD - 0.50 mmHg, [95% CI - 1.45; 0.45]; p = 0.30). Sensitivity analysis excluding the controversial data from Hermida confirmed significantly greater reductions in nocturnal systolic and diastolic BP with bedtime administration. Two of three studies reported that bedtime administration was associated with a lower proportion of non-dippers than morning treatment.

conclusionBedtime antihypertensive administration improves control of nocturnal BP in older adults aged ≥ 65 and may facilitate restoration to a dipper BP profile. No significant differences were observed in diurnal or 24/48-h mean BP reductions compared with morning administration.

Indexed as

Antihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureCircadian RhythmHypertensionAgedAged, 80 and overBlood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntihypertensive AgentsAgedAmbulatoryAntihypertensive agentsBlood pressure monitoringChronotherapyCircadian rhythmHypertension

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.