Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41028385›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

Flow Cytometry and K-mer-Based Approach for Genome Size Estimation of Clusterbean: A Case Study.

Sandhya Sharma, Kuldeep Kumar, Kumari Arpita, Lubhanshi Raje Shisodia, Sandeep Kumar, Kishor Gaikwad

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sandhya SharmaICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0518-289X
Kuldeep KumarICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2761-622X
Kumari ArpitaICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.
Lubhanshi Raje ShisodiaICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.
Sandeep KumarICMR-National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research, Noida, India.
Kishor GaikwadICAR-National Institute for Plant Biotechnology, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0484-3844

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the increasing focus on whole-genome sequencing and genomic studies in non-model organisms, there is a growing demand for reliable and accessible methods to estimate eukaryotic genome sizes across diverse taxa. Accurate genome size determination is essential for advancing genomic research and breeding programs, particularly in plants. Here, we have provided the details of two methodologies used for estimating genome size in clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba) flow cytometry [estimated genome size 580.9 Mb ± 0.02 (1C)] and the K-mer based approach (estimated genome 543.2 Mb). Flow cytometry involves staining clusterbean nuclei with a DNA-binding dye and measuring fluorescence intensity using a flow cytometer and provides a rapid genome size estimate by comparing the fluorescence data of unknown samples to a standard reference species with a known genome size. In contrast, the K-mer-based approach employs high-throughput sequencing data to analyze K-mer frequencies in short DNA sequences of length K, enabling genome size estimation through computational models. While this method is highly precise and does not require a reference genome, it necessitates extensive sequencing and bioinformatics analysis. Our study found that flow cytometry offered a quick estimation with some variability, whereas the K-mer based approach yielded a more accurate and detailed genome size estimate, and the fraction of heterozygosity in clusterbean genome was estimated to be in the range of 0.70-0.71%. This comparative analysis highlights the strengths and limitations of each method, assisting researchers in choosing the most suitable technique based on their specific needs and available resources.

Indexed as

Flow CytometryGenome, PlantGenome SizeGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingClusterbeanComputational GenomicsFlow CytometryGenome Size EstimationK-mer based approachNext generation sequencing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.