Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41028296›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Radiomics-enhanced modelling approach for predicting the need for ECMO in ARDS patients: a retrospective cohort study.

Martin Mirus, Eric Leitert, Rebecca Bockholt, Lars Heubner, Steffen Löck, Marie Brei, Jonas Biehler, Jens-Peter Kühn, Thea Koch, Wolfgang Wall and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Martin MirusDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Eric LeitertDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Rebecca BockholtDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Lars HeubnerDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Steffen LöckOncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Marie BreiInstitute for Computational Mechanics, Technical University Munich, Boltzmannstraße 15, 85748, Munich, Germany.
Jonas BiehlerInstitute for Computational Mechanics, Technical University Munich, Boltzmannstraße 15, 85748, Munich, Germany.
Jens-Peter KühnDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Thea KochDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Wolfgang WallInstitute for Computational Mechanics, Technical University Munich, Boltzmannstraße 15, 85748, Munich, Germany.
Peter Markus SpiethDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany. Peter.Spieth@uniklinikum-dresden.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decisions regarding veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vv-ECMO) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are often based solely on clinical and physiological parameters, which may insufficiently reflect severity and heterogeneity of lung injury. This study aimed to develop a predictive model integrating machine learning-derived quantitative features from admission chest computed tomography (CT) with selected clinical variables to support early individualized decision-making regarding vv-ECMO therapy. In this retrospective single-center cohort study, 375 consecutive patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS admitted to the ICU between March 2020 and April 2022 were included. Lung segmentation from initial CTs was performed using a convolutional neural network (CNN) to generate high-resolution, anatomically accurate masks of the lungs. Subsequently, 592 radiomic features, quantifying lung aeration, density and morphology, were extracted. Four clinical parameters - age, mean airway pressure, lactate, and C-reactive protein, were selected on the basis of clinical relevance. Three logistic regression models were developed: (1) Imaging Model, (2) Clinical Model, and (3) Combined Model integrating different features. Predictive performance was assessed via the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. A total of 375 patients were included: 172 in the training and 203 in the validation cohort. In the training cohort, the AUROCs were 0.743 (Imaging), 0.828 (Clinical), and 0.842 (Combined). In the validation cohort, the Combined Model achieved the highest AUROC (0.705), outperforming the Clinical (0.674) and Imaging (0.639) Models. Overall accuracy in the validation cohort was 64.0% (Combined), 66.5% (Clinical), and 59.1% (Imaging). The Combined Model showed 68.1% sensitivity and 58.9% specificity. Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed a significantly greater cumulative incidence of ECMO therapy in patients predicted as high risk (p < 0.001), underscoring its potential to support individualized, timely ECMO decisions in ARDS by providing clinicians with objective data-driven risk estimates. Quantitative CT features based on machine learning-derived lung segmentation allow early individualized prediction of the need for vv-ECMO in ARDS. While clinical data remain essential, radiomic markers enhance prognostic accuracy. The Combined Model demonstrates considerable potential to support timely and evidence-based ECMO initiation, facilitating individualized critical care in both specialized and general ICU environments.Trial registration: The study is registered with the German Clinical Trials Register under the number DRKS00027856. Registered 18.01.2022, retrospectively registered due to retrospective design of the study.

Indexed as

COVID-19Extracorporeal Membrane OxygenationRespiratory Distress SyndromeAdultAgedFemaleHumansLungMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Tomography, X-Ray ComputedCNNComputed tomographyConvolutional neural networkCritical careCTDecision makingECMOExtracorporeal membrane oxygenationLung segmentationPredictionRadiomic

Identifiers

PMID41028296
PMCPMC12485099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.