ArticleScientific reports2025
Development of a multi-epitope vaccine against Helicobacter pylori using a novel saRNA technology through an immunoinformatics approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long non-coding RNA SOCS2-AS1 inhibits gastric cancer progression via the miR-324-3p/GRIK3 axis: a mechanistic study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Computational design of a novel multi-epitope vaccine candidate against group A rotavirus.Virology journal · 2026Article
- Review
- Designing and immuno-informatics evaluation of a multi-epitope vaccine targeting lipoprotein A-4'-phosphatase (LpxF) forFrontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of a vaccine against Helicobacter pylori remains a public health priority due to its role in various gastric and non-gastric diseases, compounded by the rise of antibiotic resistance. To address the urgent need for novel interventions, we designed an in-silico self-amplifying RNA (saRNA)-based multi-epitope peptide vaccine targeting critical stages of H. pylori pathogenesis: gastric acid neutralization, bacterial adhesion, and toxin-mediated tissue damage. We employed a comprehensive computational and immunoinformatics pipeline and tools such as Geptop 2.0, VaxiJen, PSORTb v3.0.2, VirulentPred 2.0, BLASTp, TMHMM, and Expasy, IEDB's NetMHCpan, NetMHCIIpan, AutoDock Vina, GROMACS v2024, PSIPRED, I-TASSER, PROSA-web, ERRAT, ClusPro 2.0, iMODS to identify, prioritize and validate the designed multi-epitope peptide as an effective vaccine candidate. Five essential proteins in different stages (UreB, BabA, HpaA, CagA, and VacA) were selected based on their antigenicity, virulence, conserveness, human non-homologous, and transmembrane helix presence. Helper T-cell (HTL) and cytotoxic T-cell (CTL) epitopes were predicted to ensure broader HLA allele coverage. Predicted epitopes were assessed for immunogenicity, allergenicity, toxicity, and cytokine-inducing potential. The top 10 HTL and 10 CTL epitopes were incorporated into the multi-epitope Hp vaccine which showed strong binding affinities to MHC molecules and stable peptide-MHC interactions by in molecular docking and dynamics simulations. The designed Hp vaccine sequence was incorporated in standard saRNA model where second ORF (ORF-2) encoded the target vaccine peptide. Structural analyses of the translated antigen showed high structural reliability. Molecular docking and dynamic simulation of the Hp vaccine with Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) confirmed stable interactions, suggested effective innate immune activation. Finally, population coverage, discontinuous B-cell epitopes and post-translational modifications analysis confirmed immunogenic potential. Despite these promising in-silico findings, challenges remain in translating computational predictions into experimental efficacy, particularly regarding RNA stability, vaccine delivery, and immune response durability. Therefore, further in vitro and in vivo validation is warranted to confirm its efficacy and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.