ArticleScientific reports2025
A data-driven high-accuracy modelling of acidity behavior in heavily contaminated mining environments.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate estimation of water acidity is essential for characterizing acid mine drainage (AMD) and designing effective remediation strategies. However, conventional approaches, including titration and empirical estimation methods based on iron speciation, often fail to account for site-specific geochemical complexity. This study introduces a high-accuracy, site-specific empirical model for predicting acidity in AMD-impacted waters, developed from field data collected at the Trimpancho mining complex in the Iberian Pyrite Belt (Spain). Using multiple linear regression (MLR), a robust predictive relationship was established based on Cu, Al, Mn, Zn, and pH, achieving a coefficient of determination (R²) of 99.2%. The model significantly outperforms the standard Hedin method, with a lower mean absolute percentage error (13% vs. 29%). Results also reveal strong spatial and seasonal hydrochemical variability, underscoring the limitations of generalized acidity models in such environments. This work demonstrates the applicability of site-calibrated multivariate models as practical tools for enhancing acidity prediction in complex AMD systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.