ReviewSeminars in immunopathology2025
Regenerating the uterus: translational advances in endometrial bioengineering and immunotherapeutics.
Review in Seminars in immunopathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Organoids: generation strategies, applications, and future challenges.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Review
- Molecular pathways and immune microenvironment regulation in stem cell therapy for thin endometrium: a comprehensive narrative review.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Intercornual distance and postoperative reproductive outcomes in moderate-to-severe intrauterine adhesions: a retrospective cohort study.Human reproduction open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Uterine disorders, such as thin endometrium and intrauterine adhesions, remain significant challenges in reproductive medicine, often leading to infertility and poor pregnancy outcomes. Recent advances in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering have led to the development of innovative therapeutic strategies aimed at restoring endometrial structure and function. Biomaterials play a central role in these advancements, serving not only as structural scaffolds and delivery vehicles for stem/progenitor cells and bioactive molecules but also as modulators of the tissue microenvironment by promoting angiogenesis and regulating immune responses. Mesenchymal stem cells from various sources, including female reproductive tissues, along with their extracellular vesicles, have demonstrated potential in promoting angiogenesis, reducing fibrosis, and modulating immune responses for endometrial repair. Additionally, platelet-rich plasma and a range of pharmacological agents-often with advanced drug delivery systems, such as nanocarriers-further contribute to endometrial regeneration. Engineered scaffolds, particularly those derived from decellularized extracellular matrix or fabricated using three-dimensional bioprinting technologies, closely mimic the biomechanical and biochemical properties of native endometrium. These scaffolds facilitate cellular engraftment and provide valuable platforms for in vitro modeling of endometrial physiology. The development of uterus-derived extracellular matrix scaffolds with immunologically compatible biomaterials and organoids marks a pivotal step toward reducing immune rejection and improving clinical applicability. This review highlights recent progress in biomaterial-based therapeutics for uterine regeneration and discusses the remaining challenges in shifting therapeutic paradigms of personalized and tissue-specific regenerative strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41028241What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.