Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41028232›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

An autoencoder driven deep learning geospatial approach to flood vulnerability analysis in the upper and middle basin of river Damodar.

Rohit Srinivas Thappitla, Vasanta Govind Kumar Villuri, Satish Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rohit Srinivas ThappitlaGeomatics Division, Department of Mining Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines), Dhanbad, Jharkhand, 826004, India.
Vasanta Govind Kumar VilluriGeomatics Division, Department of Mining Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines), Dhanbad, Jharkhand, 826004, India. vgkvilluri@iitism.ac.in.
Satish KumarRoyal HashkoningDHV Private Limited, Noida, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flood vulnerability mapping has significantly progressed with the advent of Machine Learning (ML), bringing greater certainty to predictions. However, conventional supervised ML techniques may not be feasible in regions where recorded flood inventory data is scarce. This study introduces a novel deep learning approach using a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)-led Autoencoder to assess flood vulnerability under such conditions. The methodology utilizes eleven causative factors, represented as geospatial layers, to characterize the regional environment. These layers are processed using CNN Autoencoder and K-means clustering to produce a flood risk zonation map for the upper and middle basins of the Damodar River. The autoencoder's reconstruction performance is evaluated using metrics Mean Squared Error (MSE), precision, recall, and accuracy apart from cluster-based indices to evaluate its classification ability. The resulting map shows that 92% of the study area is safe, while less than 8% faces moderate to very high flood risk, aligning with historical patterns and validation analysis. The study highlights the strong impact of Drainage Density on model outcomes, while certain factors like Aspect introduce noise. These findings provide valuable insights into flood vulnerability, even in data-scarce regions, aiding proactive mitigation strategies for future flood events.

Indexed as

AutoencoderDamodar basinDeep learningFlood vulnerabilityRemote sensing and geographic information systemsUnsupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID41028232
PMCPMC12484983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.