ReviewNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2026
From symptom-based heterogeneity to mechanism-based profiling in youth ADHD: the promise of computational psychiatry.
Review in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Model-Based Electroencephalography Phenotyping Uncovers Distinct Neurocomputational Mechanisms Underlying Learning Impairments Across Psychopathologies.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2026Article
- The developmental dopamine trajectory hypothesis of ADHD across the lifespan.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Trajectories of mental health and mental illness: where we are now and where we go next.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mental health conditions such as attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and mood disorders show marked symptom heterogeneity, complicating diagnosis and treatment. Computational psychiatry offers a way forward by using mathematical models, such as sequential sampling models, applied to trial-by-trial behavior in well-defined neurocognitive tasks, to infer latent mechanisms underlying behavior. In ADHD, this approach has revealed consistent alterations in information integration (reduced drift rates) in attention-demanding tasks and also indicates that combinations of different model parameters (increased drift rate and longer nondecision time) distinguish the different neurocomputational mechanisms that underlie symptom dimensions. Early work in ADHD also suggests that drift rate predicts illness trajectories and provides insights into treatment response. Yet current applications remain preliminary, limited by task constraints, assumptions in model specification, and questions of reliability and generalizability of the derived parameters. Integrating mechanistic modeling with naturalistic tasks, physiological measures, and longitudinal designs may help to disentangle context-specific from generalizable processes. Ultimately, shifting from symptom descriptions to mechanistic models of belief and behavioral adaptation in dynamic environments may pave the way for next-generation assessments in ADHD, and help to support interventions that are ecologically valid, developmentally informed, and adaptive to patients' changing needs across time and context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.