ArticleScientific reports2025
Two Tabata cycles in a single training set maximize fat oxidation after exercise in male college students with overweight/obesity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tabata, which is involved 20 seconds of maximum-intensity exercise followed by 10 seconds of complete rest, repeated for 8 cycles totaling 4 minutes, has been identified to enhance energy expenditure and fat oxidation in humans. The study aims to find an optimal Tabata volume for weight loss. 32 male university students with overweight/obesity participated in three tests. Test I consisted of a single Tabata cycle, Test II consisted of two, and Test III consisted of three. Each cycle was separated by a 10-minute interval, and each test was was separated by 7 days. Gas exchange indices were monitored during the last Tabata cycle of the test and the 30-minute recovery period. Subsequently, fat and glucose oxidation amounts, rates, and energy expenditure were calculated. During the 10-minute recovery period, the fat oxidation amounts of Test II (0.80±0.26 g) and Test III (0.87±0.24 g) were higher than Test I (0.50±0.11 g, p<0.001). There was no significant difference between Test II and Test III. During the 20-minute and 30-minute recovery periods, Test II (3.21±0.50 g; 5.04±1.02 g) showed significantly higher fat oxidation amount than Test I (2.47±0.59 g, p<0.001; 4.41±0.98 g, p<0.05) and Test III (2.80±0.43 g, p<0.001; 4.11±0.96 g, p<0.001), there was no significant difference between Test I and Test III (p>0.05). No significant differences in energy expenditure were observed among the three tests during recovery periods (p>0.05). We conclude that two Tabata cycles show the highest fat oxidation amount with the same energy expenditure amount during the recovery period, which is the optimal Tabata volume for weight loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.