Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41028130›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comparison of geostatistical and response surface methodology for estimating soil saturated hydraulic conductivity.

Lin Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Lin ChengNorth China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, 450046, China. 15617596087@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ks) is a critical parameter for modeling water and solute transport in soils. Conventional laboratory measurements of Ks are labor-intensive, costly, and susceptible to measurement errors, underscoring the need for more reliable estimation techniques. This study systematically compares the performance of Ordinary Kriging (OK), Ordinary Co-Kriging (OCK), and Response Surface Methodology (RSM) for Ks estimation, thereby integrating geostatistical and statistical optimization frameworks. Soil samples were collected from 135 locations within the surface layer (0-30 cm), and Ks along with key soil physicochemical properties were determined. In the geostatistical domain, OK based on a spherical semivariogram (R

Indexed as

Co-krigingOrdinary krigingResponse surface methodologySoil saturated hydraulic conductivity

Identifiers

PMID41028130
PMCPMC12484988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.