Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41028126›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Blockchain consensus algorithm for supply chain information security sharing based on convolutional neural networks.

Lu Cai, Aijun Liu, Yongcai Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lu CaiSchool of Economics and Management, Hubei University of Education, Wuhan, 430205, Hubei, China.
Aijun LiuSchool of Economics and Management, Hubei University of Education, Wuhan, 430205, Hubei, China. cl8866k@163.com.
Yongcai YanSchool of Economics, Management and Low, Hubei Normal University, Wuhan University of Technology, Huangshi, 435002, Hubei, China.

Funding

Research on the Mechanism and Utility of Supply Chain Information Governance in the Digital Ecosystem Environment) and The Philosophy and Social Science Foundation of Hubei Provincial Department of Education 22D075The Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province 2024AFB902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To solve the problems of data silos and information asymmetry in traditional supply chain information security sharing, this article combines Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and blockchain consensus algorithms, analyzes data and uses blockchain for secure sharing, so that all parties can obtain and verify data in real time, improve the overall operational efficiency of the supply chain, and promote information transparency and sharing efficiency. CNN can be used to analyze data in the supply chain. Training on real digital images ensures data privacy and improves the accuracy and efficiency of data processing. Blockchain technology can be introduced into supply chain information sharing to ensure the immutability and transparency of data. This article introduces a federated learning (FL) mechanism to improve consensus algorithms, which improves the efficiency of model training. Among them, each link in the FL process is rigorously verified and recorded through the consensus mechanism of blockchain, ensuring the security and reliability of the entire process. This article adopts an improved consensus algorithm, PoDaS (Proof of Data Sharing), whose core idea is to use the computational consumption generated during FL as proof of workload. The specific steps include: local model training and uploading, model update verification shield, and model update aggregation. The PoDaS algorithm combines the advantages of PoW (Proof of Work) and PoS (Proof of Stack) to ensure the fairness of the consensus mechanism and reduce the waste of computing resources. By comparing and analyzing the block time and model accuracy of three algorithms, the superiority of PoDaS algorithm in block time and model accuracy was verified. The experimental results show that the PoDaS algorithm is significantly better than the PoW algorithm in terms of block generation time, and slightly better than the PoS algorithm. In terms of model accuracy, the PoDaS algorithm is significantly superior to traditional PoW and PoS algorithms. Its model accuracy reaches 96.00%, reflecting the effectiveness and practicality of the PoDaS consensus algorithm in the sharing of supply chain information security.

Indexed as

Blockchain consensus algorithmConvolutional neural networksFederated learningInformation sharingProof of data sharing

Identifiers

PMID41028126
PMCPMC12485184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.