ArticleScientific reports2025
Effects of resistance training and aerobic training on improving the composition of middle-aged adults with obesity in an interventional study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- The effect of exercise snacks on cardiorespiratory fitness, body composition, metabolic health, and muscle strength in sedentary individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Adipose Tissue Expandability as a Link Between Nutrition and Obesity-Related Metabolic Risk: Insights from Bariatric Surgery.Nutrients · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated the effectiveness of a resistance and aerobic training model among 71 middle-aged participants aged 30-60 (mean age 44.27 ± 8.67 years; mean BMI 27.94 ± 3.92 kg/m²) with obesity, comprising 36 males and 35 females (male/female ratio ≈ 1.03:1). Participants were categorized into four groups based on their self-reported training regimens: dietary-only (Group C), aerobic fat oxidation (Group F), high-intensity interval training (Group H), and resistance training (Group R). Subjects followed their specialized routines through online and offline sources for at least 12 weeks. Groups F, H, and R demonstrated statistically lower body weight as well as waist-to-hip ratio and body fat percent levels, when assessed against Group C (P < 0.01). The combination of resistance training with specific benefits produced larger reductions in waist-to-hip ratio, together with android fat mass, primarily observed among male participants (P < 0.01). The participants in Group H demonstrated the greatest decrease in body fat percentage among female subjects (P < 0.01), even though Group R participants achieved beneficial results, although their adherence level was less than ideal. Participants from all experimental groups maintained similar levels of muscle mass. The hybrid online and offline approach effectively enhanced adherence and engagement, demonstrating its scalability and potential for managing obesity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.