ArticleScientific reports2025
Gaze and movement adaptation in response to delayed robotic movement during turn-taking.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Helping or watching it happen: how participants respond to robot failures in a turn-taking game.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While delays in human-robot encounters can harm perceptions of competence, they can also enhance engagement and relatability, making timing a crucial factor in the design of robot behaviors for effective human-robot interaction. Previous research has primarily focused on how robots' pauses or errors impact perceptions of competence, but it has not adequately addressed the complexity of timing in shaping social interactions. This study explored the effects of different delay conditions (no delay, short delay (4s), long delay (10s)) on human gaze behaviors and movements during a Tic-Tac-Toe game interactions with an Epi humanoid robot. We hypothesized that shorter delays would be interpreted as thinking pauses, increasing engagement, operationalized as directing gaze to the robot's hand or face, while longer delays would lead to distractions, i.e. gazing away from the robot and perhaps searching for cues in other places. Gaze indicates attentional focus, a common proxy for engagement in HRI. The results, however, indicated that the no delay condition prompted the highest levels of participants gazing at the robot's hand ('gaze to hand behavior'), with significantly more frequent gaze to hand behavior compared to both delay conditions. The duration of participants gazing at the robot's face ('face gaze') showed no significant differences, though trends suggested participants engaged more in face gaze in the no delay condition. Interestingly, during delay periods, participants spent significantly more time gazing at the robot's face and hands, suggesting a monitoring response to unexpected pauses. Additionally, positive pre-interaction impressions of the robot were linked to higher gaze to hand behavior, while increased face gaze was associated with lower fluency ratings, indicating compensatory behavior during perceived interaction difficulties. These findings suggest that delays reduce overall engagement regardless of duration, while they might increase engagement temporally while the delays take place. The results also highlight the complexity of gaze behaviors in human-robot interaction and suggest that gaze patterns can indicate participants' perceptions of the robot's performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.