ArticleScientific reports2025
Creating nasal cycle simulations by processing MRI and CT scan data with image morphing algorithms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The nasal cycle, characterized by alternating congestion and decongestion of the nasal passages, plays a vital role in nasal function. Predicting the nasal cycle using data from medical imaging modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT), can help elucidate its impact on nasal physiology and inform surgical intervention strategies. This study introduces an image processing algorithm that predicts temporal variations in nasal airway morphology during the nasal cycle by utilizing a single MRI or CT scan from a patient. Our approach pipelines two algorithms: an active contour (snake) algorithm followed by a path planning algorithm. The active contour algorithm identifies corresponding sets of points between contours of the nasal wall and the desired turbinate geometry, while the path planning algorithm generates pathways connecting the corresponding point sets. This process enables the prediction of intermediate geometries between two different levels of nasal congestion observed at distinct time points during the nasal cycle. Prediction accuracy was assessed by comparing predicted and actual intermediate nasal turbinate geometries in scans taken from the same subject at different time points, using a total of six human patients. Two distinct path planning models, linear image morphing and A-star, were evaluated for their accuracy in predicting intermediate nasal geometries at various congestion levels. Cross-sectional area was used to characterize nasal airway geometry. Prediction accuracies for nasal geometries within respiratory regions, including middle and inferior turbinates, ranged from 72.51% - 92.17% for the linear image morphing method and from 70.73% - 90.8% for the A-star method. This algorithm-based tool offers a reliable means to estimate nasal geometries at different congestion levels throughout the nasal cycle using MRI and CT scan data. Coupling this technology with computational modeling could further aid in studying how the nasal cycle influences airflow dynamics under various breathing conditions or pathological states.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.