ArticleScientific reports2025
Harnessing operating room signals to estimate mean arterial pressure with AnesthNet.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Monitoring mean arterial pressure (MAP) is essential for ensuring safe general anesthesia. Current practices rely either on non-invasive cuff measurements, which suffer from poor temporal resolution, or invasive arterial lines, which provide excellent accuracy and resolution but carry a significant risk of complications. Therefore, identifying alternatives to arterial lines in the operating rooms is a pressing need. Despite the importance of this issue in the community, clinically viable non-invasive MAP monitoring methods have yet to emerge. Existing approaches often encounter reproducibility issues, notably on large, open-source databases, and are not always optimized for real-time predictions. To address these limitations, this study introduces AnesthNet, a deep learning architecture designed for MAP estimation, using data exclusively from non-invasive and routine sensors such as photoplethysmography, ECG, and cuff oscillometer. AnesthNet was evaluated against the best-performing state-of-the-art deep learning architectures, using international standards to assess their performance on two of the largest datasets to date: VitalDB (2,833 patients) and LaribDB (5,060 patients). AnesthNet achieved superior performances, reaching an MAE of 4.6 (± 4.7) mmHg on VitalDB and 3.8 (± 5.7) mmHg on LaribDB. Our model also outperformed other architectures for different delays in cuff values and yielded no significant latency during inference, meeting clinical real-time requirements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.