ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimizing water quality index using machine learning: a six-year comparative study in riverine and reservoir systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and deployment of a groundwater quality prediction tool for Béchar, Southwest Algeria: benchmarking seven machine learning algorithms.Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Human activities and climate change are intensifying threats to water quality, necessitating scientifically robust assessments to strengthen water resource management and ensure safe drinking water. However, the global application of WQI has increased significantly while facing persistent uncertainties in parameter weighting, aggregation functions, and model transparency. In this study, a comparative optimization framework using three machine learning algorithms, five weighting methods, and eight aggregation functions, was proposed for water quality index (WQI) model improvement. Two typical surface water systems, i.e., riverine and reservoir water bodies, were analyzed using six-year monthly data (2017-2022) from 31 sites in a typical mega hydro-engineering, the Danjiangkou Reservoir (DJKR) of China. Key findings include: (1) The Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model achieved superior performance, and 97% accuracy for river sites (logarithmic loss: 0.12), which is excellent in scoring. (2)A new proposed WQI model, i.e., the Bhattacharyya mean WQI model (BMWQI) coupling with the Rank Order Centroid (ROC) weighting method, can significantly outperform other WQI models in reducing uncertainty, showing eclipsing rates for rivers and reservoirs at 17.62% and 4.35%, respectively. (3) For the case DJKR, key indicators included total phosphorus (TP), permanganate index, and ammonia nitrogen were effectively selected by the developed WQI model for rivers, and TP and water temperature were identified in reservoir area, respectively. This study improved surface water quality assessment methodology by integrating machine learning techniques and innovative aggregation functions. The framework demonstrates practical value for water quality policy formulation by enabling targeted identification of critical pollutants and optimizing monitoring efficiency through feature selection. Its adaptability to diverse aquatic systems underscores broad applicability across geographical regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.