Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41028038›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Constrained coding for error mitigation in nanopore-based DNA data storage.

Kallie Whritenour, Mete Civelek, Farzad Farnoud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kallie WhritenourComputer Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA.
Mete CivelekBiomedical Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA.
Farzad FarnoudElectrical and Computer Engineering and Computer Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA. farzad@virginia.edu.

Funding

NSF 1816409
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA has been proposed as an alternative to magnetic and solid-state devices for storing digital data. In DNA data storage, writing data is performed through DNA synthesis, and reading is done via sequencing. Nanopore devices for sequencing DNA, like those produced by Oxford Nanopore Technologies, allow long reads and real-time sequencing but with lower accuracy compared to other sequencers, such as Illumina. To improve the reliability of data storage in DNA, we aim to combat the high error rate of nanopore sequencing using constrained coding. Certain aspects of the physical process underlying nanopore sequencing mean that some sequences are more prone to sequencing errors than others. We leverage this observation to design constrained codes using constrained de Bruijn graphs, along with a state-splitting encoder and a Viterbi-based decoder. We find that the overall performance of our novel coding system substantially improves upon the state-of-the-art DNN-based methods, reducing sequence-level errors by up to 6 times. We also visually demonstrate the performance of our approach through the simulated recovery of an image encoded and decoded using our method.

Indexed as

DNAInformation Storage and RetrievalNanoporesNanopore SequencingSequence Analysis, DNAAlgorithmsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingDNA

Identifiers

PMID41028038
PMCPMC12484628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.