ArticleScientific reports2025
Portability of short term wind power forecasting: investigating model calibration using wind power data from Ireland and UK.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wind power forecasting (WPF) models play an increasingly important role in integrating wind power into electricity systems. Portability of such models allows for quantified calibration features which can be taken from one farm and applied to another without compromising forecast accuracy. This paper investigates the portability of WPF methods by exploring the influence of model hyperparameter configurations on forecasting performance. The performance of two hybrid WPF methods are evaluated and compared, Variational Mode Decomposition & Feed Forward Neural Network (VMD-FFNN) and Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition & Feed Forward Neural Network (EEMD-FFNN). Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) data from wind farms in Ireland and the UK are utilised. The robustness and portability of the WPF methods when applied to different datasets are examined. The models demonstrated good forecasting accuracy, with the VMD-FFNN model achieving 3.42% NMAE error for the Irish site. For portability, the forecasting performance is found to be sensitive to two of the four model hyperparameters examined. A low number of modes used in signal decomposition, beyond a threshold of ~4 modes, is adequate for accurate prediction, although calibration is still required depending on the wind farm. Additionally, the number and variety of datasets improved model robustness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.