ArticleScientific reports2025
Automatic detection of harmful cyanobacterial genera using deep CNN models and artemisinin optimization.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Herbarium specimens in the age of artificial intelligence: from herbarium image identification to Integrative Taxonomic AI.Journal of plant research · 2026Article
- Recent Progress in the Detection and Monitoring of Toxin-Producing Cyanoprokaryotes and Their Toxins.Toxics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Concerns over the spread of Cyanobacteria, which can lead to dangerous blooms that harm drinking water quality and, therefore, the health of plants and animals, are being raised by global warming. Traditional methods for assessing the amount of toxic species in water samples are often time-consuming, require intensive manual effort, are prone to subjective errors, and can lead to delays in necessary water management interventions. This emphasizes the pressing need for a quick and precise automated method. Both aquatic and terrestrial environments include cyanobacteria, and under some circumstances, poisonous cyanobacteria can grow in large numbers and form harmful blooms called harmful cyanobacterial blooms (Cyano-HABs). In addition, cyanoHABs cause hypoxia, ecological imbalances, the generation of toxins, and other detrimental phenomena that put people, animals, and plants in danger of illness. Climate change is expected to cause these situations to increase in frequency and globally. This study presents a novel approach for the automatic detection of harmful cyanobacteria genera by utilizing a newly introduced and publicly available dataset, TCB-DS. In the initial stage, discriminative features are extracted using two powerful deep Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models: ShuffleNet and ResNet-50. Subsequently, feature fusion is applied to the extracted features to enhance the representation. Then, to select the most relevant features, feature selection is performed using the Artemisinin Optimization (AO) algorithm, a robust meta-heuristic algorithm inspired by the mechanisms of malaria treatment and recently proposed in 2024. This step aims to reduce feature redundancy and improve the overall efficiency of the model. In classifying microscopic images of cyanobacteria species with the proposed method, GoogleNet, MobileNetV2, EfficientNetb0, DarkNet53, ShuffleNet, and ResNet101 models were used. Among these, the proposed method obtained the highest accuracy, with a mean accuracy of 97.471% and max accuracy of 97.683%. Since these results are the highest accuracy values obtained in the TCB-DS dataset, our proposed method significantly improves water quality monitoring in our world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.