ArticleScientific reports2025
Prediction of treatment-resistant depression using the 23andMe survey data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient-reported drug responses offer an alternative approach to design and develop a predictive model for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) in major depressive disorder (MDD). The variables described in phenotypic analysis (i.e., demographics, depression clinical characteristics, psychiatric comorbidities, and vulnerability characteristics) of the antidepressant efficacy survey from previously reported study among 23andMe, Inc. research participants were identified as predictors to classify TRD or non-TRD. A total of 101 features were engineered for 23,779 participants, with stratified split between training (80% of the total participants included in the model) and holdout (20% of the participants) datasets. Significant predictors included residual symptoms, years in life having ≥ 2 weeks depressive episode, stress level, duration of depressive episodes, age, suicidal ideation, symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder, and latency. The final model achieved a model performance with receiver operating characteristics area under curve (AUC) at 78% and precision recall AUC at 44%. The proposed predictive model could improve the management of MDD by providing an assessment of risk factors and antidepressant treatment effects, thereby facilitating reliable identification of patients with TRD. The model could potentially address the gaps observed in real-world settings, where identification of TRD is often delayed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.