ArticleScientific reports2025
Explainable artificial intelligence identifies and localizes left ventricular scar in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy using 12-Lead electrocardiogram.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Myocardial Fibrosis in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Leveraging Quantitative Imaging and Artificial Intelligence for Precision Management.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Left ventricular (LV) scar is a major risk factor for sudden death and heart failure in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). LV scar evolves over time and needs longitudinal assessment. Currently, LV scar detection relies on late gadolinium enhancement MRI, which is limited by high cost and artifacts from implanted cardiac devices. To address this, we developed XplainScar, an explainable machine learning model that identifies LV scar using 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) data. XplainScar was trained and validated on retrospective data from 748 HCM patients across two centers (500 from Johns Hopkins hospital for model development, and 248 from UCSF for validation). XplainScar employs a combination of unsupervised and self-supervised representation learning to effectively predict scar presence, and discover ECG features associated with LV scar. XplainScar rapidly analyzes ECG data (< 1 min for 10 patients) and demonstrates strong predictive performance on the held-out test set, achieving an F1-score of 89%, sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 78%, and precision of 88%. By providing an effective, cost-effective, and transparent alternative to MRI, XplainScar has the potential to assist with patient care, and reduce healthcare costs related to LV scar monitoring in HCM. XplainScar is available at https://github.com/KasraNezamabadi/XplainScar .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.