ArticleScientific reports2025
Measuring political polarization through visible interactions between religious and non-religious citizens.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study offers a new method for measuring polarization by using advanced computer vision techniques that involve object detection and measurements of physical distances between pedestrians. Motivated by escalating political polarization around the world, and specifically by the ideological divide between secularism and political Islam in Turkey, we analyze more than 1,400 publicly available YouTube videos recorded on the streets of Turkey. From these videos, we extract and use approximately 170,000 frames that show pedestrians. The analysis detects and categorizes pedestrians based on their gender and level of religiosity by using the YOLOv5 algorithm and develops and refines two innovative distance estimation techniques for calculating the relative distances between pairs of pedestrians. Our unique technical approach allows us to convert the 2D distances in the street videos into 3D relative distances between pedestrians of different genders and levels of religiosity. These distances are then used as a proxy for measuring the extent of polarization. The study concludes that social factors significantly influence these distances, with individuals from similar backgrounds (i.e., religious people, religious females, and non-religious females) tending to walk closer to their in-group. The greatest distances are measured between non-religious males and religious females, as well as between religious females and non-religious males, reflecting traditional gender boundaries in predominantly Muslim communities and highlighting how religious and cultural norms shape social interactions. The image dataset we have assembled stands as the most extensive collection of thematic street imagery found in computational social science research and represents the largest dataset ever gathered for analyzing political polarization in Turkey.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.