Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41027966›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

In vitro digestion of cake, biscuit and peanut balls infused with Spirulina using dynamic models.

Saravanan Chinnadurai, Keerthivarman Kumar, Akash Raj Ramu, Stalin Selvaraj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Saravanan ChinnaduraiCentre for Nanotechnology & Advanced Biomaterials (CeNTAB), School of Chemical & Biotechnology, SASTRA Deemed to be University, Thanjavur, 613 401, Tamil Nadu, India.
Keerthivarman KumarCentre for Nanotechnology & Advanced Biomaterials (CeNTAB), School of Chemical & Biotechnology, SASTRA Deemed to be University, Thanjavur, 613 401, Tamil Nadu, India.
Akash Raj RamuCentre for Nanotechnology & Advanced Biomaterials (CeNTAB), School of Chemical & Biotechnology, SASTRA Deemed to be University, Thanjavur, 613 401, Tamil Nadu, India.
Stalin SelvarajCentre for Nanotechnology & Advanced Biomaterials (CeNTAB), School of Chemical & Biotechnology, SASTRA Deemed to be University, Thanjavur, 613 401, Tamil Nadu, India. stalin@scbt.sastra.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The formulations were prepared using standard protocols, with 4% (w/w) spirulina powder added to each product. After each digestion phase, the samples were analyzed for carbohydrates, protein, carotenoids, and phycocyanin. The results showed that the formulated food products had altered nutritional compositions compared to their spirulina-free counterparts, with increased protein and decreased carbohydrate levels. Our findings indicated that spirulina-infused formulation exhibited increasing concentrations of carotenoids in cake (186.468 µg/g), peanut balls (164.596 µg/g), and biscuit (196.448 µg/g) and in the case of phycocyanin levels were found to higher in the spirulina infused cake (6.097 mg/g), peanut balls (6.88 mg/g), biscuit (5.467 mg/g). In contrast, phycocyanin is a potential antioxidant that is only present in spirulina-infused formulations, not in non-infused snack formulations. Thus, uniqueness gives better nutritional and therapeutic value to spirulina-infused formulations. The findings of this study provide valuable insights into the digestibility and bioavailability of nutrients in spirulina-based nutrition formulations, contributing to their potential health benefits.

Indexed as

ArachisDigestionSpirulinaCarotenoidsHumansPhycocyaninCarotenoidsPhycocyanin

Identifiers

PMID41027966
PMCPMC12484845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.