Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41027957›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Comparative analysis of cysteine protease nano-formulations to manage callosobruchus maculatus fabricius and trogoderma granarium everts in stored products.

Sarah Ahmad, Ahmed Akrem, Muhammad Najam-Ul-Haq, Sohaib Mehmood, Muazzama Batool, Ahsan Saeed, Fahmida Jabeen, Saima Ashraf, Nabila Bashir, Qamar Saeed

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sarah AhmadDepartment of Entomology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences & Technology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, 60800, Pakistan.
Ahmed AkremInstitute of Botany, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, 60800, Pakistan.
Muhammad Najam-Ul-HaqInstitute of Chemical Sciences, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, 60800, Pakistan.
Sohaib MehmoodInstitute of Botany, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, 60800, Pakistan.
Muazzama BatoolDepartment of Agriculture (Research Wing), Cotton Research Institute, Multan, Pakistan.
Ahsan SaeedInstitute of Botany, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, 60800, Pakistan.
Fahmida JabeenInstitute of Chemical Sciences, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, 60800, Pakistan.
Saima AshrafInstitute of Chemical Sciences, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, 60800, Pakistan.
Nabila BashirInstitute of Chemical Sciences, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, 60800, Pakistan.
Qamar SaeedDepartment of Entomology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences & Technology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, 60800, Pakistan. qamarsaeed@bzu.edu.pk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grains are stored worldwide after harvesting for food and seed. During storage grain loss occurs because of insect pests. Stored grain insect pests have long range of hosts, from cereals to dry fruits and legumes. Callosobruchus maculatus (Fabricius) (Chrysomelidae; Coleoptera) and Trogoderma granarium (Everts) (Dermestidae; Coleoptera) are key pests of stored products and can loss 50% of the commodity during storage. Multiple measures have been adopted worldwide to minimize this loss but the problem remains constant. Conventional fumigants are being restricted in application because of development of insecticide resistance in insect pests. Hence, development of a promising tool for sustainable management and food security is required. This study describes development of nano-formulated biopesticides for managing stored product insect pests C. maculatus and T. granarium. Cysteine protease (PeuCP) from Populus euphratica was extracted, purified (by ammonium sulfate saturation prior to gel filtration chromatography), and identified through LC-MS/MS. The molecular interaction of PeuCP with substrate (chitin) was documented via in-silico study. The insecticidal activity of PeuCP was assessed through bioassays against the mentioned stored product insect pests at three concentrations (10, 5 and 2.5 mg/g). Computational analysis showed molecular interaction of PeuCP at five potential sites for ligand (N-acetyl-D-glucosamine) binding in which the strongest site with the highest drug score (Site-1) was located near N-terminus. The insecticidal assays of PeuCP without nano-formulation revealed inhibited population buildup of C. maculatus and delayed life stages development in T. granarium. The growth inhibition of tested insects confirmed the substrate binding of PeuCP. The PeuCP was formulated with Graphene Quantum Dots (GQDs) and Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles (ZnO NPs) for increased insecticidal activity, among which GQDs nanoformulation was more promising. Nanoformulated PeuCP had the potential to control stored grain insect pests as alternative to chemical insecticides.

Indexed as

ColeopteraCysteine ProteasesInsecticidesAnimalsChitinInsect ControlChitinCysteine ProteasesInsecticidesBiopesticidesGraphene quantum dotsPopulus EuphraticaToxicityZinc oxide nanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID41027957
PMCPMC12484994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.