Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41027951›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Advanced MRI based Alzheimer's diagnosis through ensemble learning techniques.

Suthir Sriram, V Nivethitha, T P Arun Kaarthic, S Archita, Thangavel Murugan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Suthir SriramDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Amrita School of Computing, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Chennai, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2480-3273
V NivethithaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Amrita School of Computing, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Chennai, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8694-033X
T P Arun KaarthicDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Amrita School of Computing, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Chennai, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-6610-4507
S ArchitaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Amrita School of Computing, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Chennai, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-9097-2273
Thangavel MuruganCollege of Information and Technology, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. thangavelm@uaeu.ac.ae.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2510-8857

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alzheimer's Disease is a condition that affects the brain and causes changes in behavior and memory loss while making it hard to carry out tasks properly. It's vital to spot the illness early, for effective treatment. MRI technology has advanced in detecting Alzheimer's by using machine learning and deep learning models. These models use neural networks to analyze brain MRI results automatically and identify key indicators of Alzheimer's disease. In this study, we used MRI data to train a CNN for diagnosing and categorizing the four stages of Alzheimer's disease with deep learning techniques, offering significant advantages in identifying patterns in medical imaging for this neurodegenerative condition compared to using a CNN exclusively trained for this purpose. They evaluated ResNet50, InceptionResNetv2 as well as a CNN specifically trained for their study and found that combining the models led to highly accurate results. The accuracy rates for the trained CNN model stood at 90.76%, InceptionResNetv2 at 86.84%, and ResNet50 at 90.27%. In this trial run of the experiment conducted by combining all three models collaboratively resulted in an accuracy rate of 94.27% compared to the accuracy rates of each model working individually.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseBrainMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingAgedDeep LearningEnsemble LearningFemaleHumansMaleNeural Networks, ComputerAlzheimer’s DetectionCNNDeep learningEnsembleInceptionResNetV2Residual Net (ResNet)ResNet50

Identifiers

PMID41027951
PMCPMC12485106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.