Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41027935›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Machine learning for stroke prediction using imbalanced data.

Nataliia Melnykova, Yurii Patereha, Stepan Skopivskyi, Mykola Farion, Solomia Fedushko, Khrystyna Drohomyretska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nataliia MelnykovaDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, 79013, Ukraine.
Yurii PaterehaDepartment of Computer-Aided Design, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, 79013, Ukraine.
Stepan SkopivskyiDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, 79013, Ukraine.
Mykola FarionDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, 79013, Ukraine.
Solomia FedushkoDepartment of Social Communication and Information Activities, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, 79013, Ukraine. solomiia.s.fedushko@lpnu.ua.
Khrystyna DrohomyretskaDepartment of Mathematics, Lviv Polytechnic National University, Lviv, 79013, Ukraine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The research focused on predicting strokes, a significant threat to health and well-being. The primary challenge addressed was the use of a highly imbalanced dataset. Various data preprocessing techniques were employed to tackle this, enabling the construction and comparison of machine-learning models for stroke prediction. Among the models assessed, the random forest model proved to be the most effective, achieving precision, recall, and F1-score levels of 90%, along with an accuracy of 90%. A random forest classifier was also trained using optimal hyperparameters obtained via grid search on balanced data to highlight the limitations of relying solely on accuracy in classification tasks. This approach demonstrated the model's high accuracy of 96%, underscoring the impracticality of using accuracy as the sole metric for performance evaluation in imbalanced datasets. In conclusion, the research underscores the critical role of advanced data processing and machine learning techniques in enhancing stroke prediction. The successful application of the random forest model and the recognition of accuracy's limitations provide a robust framework for future studies and practical implementations in healthcare settings. This work advances the predictive capabilities for stroke and paves the way for improved approaches to healthcare strategies, ultimately aiming to save lives and enhance the quality of life for individuals at risk.

Indexed as

Machine LearningStrokeHumansAda boostDecision treeGrid searchK-neighborsMachine learningRandom forestRandom under-samplingStackingStroke

Identifiers

PMID41027935
PMCPMC12484691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.