ReviewNature communications2025
Best practices and tools in R and Python for statistical processing and visualization of lipidomics and metabolomics data.
Review in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Seed biopriming with a novel endophytic Bacillus licheniformis strain RGS enhances drought tolerance and recovery in tomato.Archives of microbiology · 2026Article
- Multi-omics dissection of heat stress reveals CIITA as a central regulator of metabolic thermotolerance in cattle (Bos taurus).Communications biology · 2026Article
- Pilot study of screening method for pancreatic cancer using lipidomic profiling of plasma or serum.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Lipidomics in Melanoma: Insights into Disease Progression and Therapeutical Targets.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Membrane Molecular Species Remodeling as a Signature of ω-3 Fatty Acid Action in Cultured Neural Cells.ASN neuro · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mass spectrometry-based lipidomics and metabolomics generate extensive data sets that, along with metadata such as clinical parameters, require specific data exploration skills to identify and visualize statistically significant trends and biologically relevant differences. Besides tailored methods developed by individual labs, a solid core of freely accessible tools exists for exploratory data analysis and visualization, which we have compiled here, including preparation of descriptive statistics, annotated box plots, hypothesis testing, volcano plots, lipid maps and fatty acyl chain plots, unsupervised and supervised dimensionality reduction, dendrograms, and heat maps. This review is intended for those who would like to develop their skills in data analysis and visualization using freely available R or Python solutions. Beginners are guided through a selection of R and Python libraries for producing publication-ready graphics without being overwhelmed by the code complexity. This manuscript, along with associated GitBook code repository containing step-by-step instructions, offers readers a comprehensive guide, encouraging the application of R and Python for robust and reproducible chemometric analysis of omics data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.