Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41027846›Full record

ArticleSociology of health & illness2025

Negotiating Care and Control: Women's Experiences of Two Harm Reduction Services in Copenhagen.

Sif Ingibergsdottir Mogensen, Cameron Duff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sif Ingibergsdottir MogensenCentre for Alcohol and Drug Research, Aarhus University, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0001-3591-9872
Cameron DuffCentre for Organisations and Social Change, College of Business and Law, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we build on literature examining care practices in harm reduction services to investigate some of the reasons why women who use drugs access, remain in or leave harm reduction services. Through the analysis of ethnographic fieldwork collected at two Danish harm reduction services, including 29 interviews with women who use drugs, this study examines how care is practised in these services, what conditions these practices and how women are affected by this care. Our findings indicate that care is enacted in material, social and affective practices and relations, including the provision of everyday necessities, bodily affection and staff expressions of concern and sympathy that promote belonging. However, these care practices are also conditioned by relations of control mediated by workplace factors, the impacts of national and organisational policies including ongoing resourcing challenges, staff understanding of care practices and intersecting dynamics of gender, ethnicity and class. Women's experiences of harm reduction services are mediated by their everyday struggles negotiating relations of care and control with significant implications for both the quality of care delivered in these sites and its impacts. We close by reflecting on the tensions between care and control in harm reduction programmes for women.

Indexed as

Harm ReductionNegotiatingSubstance-Related DisordersAdultAnthropology, CulturalDenmarkFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMiddle AgedQualitative Researchcarecontroldrug consumption roomemergency shelterharm reductionwomen who use drugs

Identifiers

PMID41027846
PMCPMC12483968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.