ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2025
Insurance coverage and employment after Medicaid expansion with work requirements: quasi-experimental difference-in-differences study.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiometabolic health of low- and higher-income adults in the United States, 2009-2023.American heart journal · 2026Article
- County Indigent Care programs fill coverage gaps left by Medicaid restrictions: evidence from Texas.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Medicaid Work-Reporting Requirements Under HR 1 and Insufficient or Inconsistent Work Hours.JAMA health forum · 2026Article
- Article
- Conditional Medicaid Expansion and Mental Health Outcomes in Georgia.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Functional Status of Adults at Risk of Medicaid Disenrollment Under National Work Requirements.Annals of internal medicine · 2026Article
- Rural Disinvestment and the Fragility of North Carolina's Expansion: Responding to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act.North Carolina medical journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo understand how health insurance coverage and employment changed among working age adults with low incomes in Georgia, the first state to implement Medicaid expansion with work requirements under the Pathways to Coverage program.
designQuasi-experimental difference-in-differences study.
settingGeorgia, which expanded Medicaid with work requirements on 1 July 2023; Alabama, Florida, Mississippi, South Carolina, and Tennessee, which neighbor Georgia and did not expand Medicaid; and South Dakota, which simultaneously expanded Medicaid without work requirements.
participantsAdults aged 19-64 years with low incomes defined as ≤100% of the federal poverty level who completed the US Census Bureau's household pulse survey between 2021 and 2024.
main outcome measuresMedicaid coverage, uninsured rate, and employment.
resultsThe study population consisted of 3303 adults in Georgia (intervention state) and 14 148 in neighboring states that did not expand Medicaid (controls). After the implementation of Pathways to Coverage, Medicaid coverage did not change in Georgia (35.5% to 32.4%) or in neighboring control states (39.6% to 39.3%), resulting in no differential change in Medicaid coverage between these states (adjusted difference-in-differences -3.0 percentage points, 95% confidence interval -7.6 to 1.6). These patterns were similar for the uninsured rate (-2.3 percentage points, -6.9 to 2.3). Additionally, employment did not increase in Georgia compared with control states (-1.6 percentage points, -8.7 to 5.4). In a secondary analysis that aimed to isolate the effects of work requirements, Medicaid coverage did not change in Georgia (35.5% to 32.4%) but increased in South Dakota (36.6% to 44.6%)-a state that expanded Medicaid without work requirements-resulting in a differential decrease in coverage in Georgia relative to South Dakota (-11.7 percentage points, -19.5 to -3.9). There was no differential change in employment (-0.1 percentage points, -9.8 to 9.6) between these states.
conclusionsThe implementation of work requirements with Medicaid expansion in Georgia did not increase health insurance coverage or employment during the first 15 months of the program. These findings have important implications as US policy makers recently enacted legislation that will mandate work requirements in Medicaid programs across all US states beginning in 2026.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.