Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41027693›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

ColoCap: determining the diagnostic accuracy of colon capsule endoscopy compared with standard colonoscopy in patients at risk of colorectal disease - a study protocol.

Hussain Ibrahim, Monica Haritakis, Lisa Ballantine, Kirsty McCormack, Seonaidh Cotton, Jemma Hudson, Karl Atkin, Stephen Rogers, Lisette Sheena Nixon, Angel Verghese and 8 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Hussain IbrahimUniversity of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK s02hi9@abdn.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5595-937X
Monica HaritakisYork and Scarborough Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK.
Lisa BallantineYork and Scarborough Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK.
Kirsty McCormackCHaRT - Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6051-1513
Seonaidh CottonHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Jemma HudsonHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen College of Life Sciences and Medicine, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6440-6419
Karl AtkinDepartment of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Stephen RogersPPI Representative, York, UK.
Lisette Sheena NixonCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1270-6970
Angel VergheseYork Health Economics Consortium Ltd, Heslington, UK.
Hayden HolmesYork Health Economics Consortium Ltd, Heslington, UK.
Shaun TreweekUniversity of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Graeme MacLennanHealth Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1039-5646
Sunil DolwaniDepartment of Gastroenterology, Cardiff and Vale UHB, Cardiff, UK.
Georgina GardnerCardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Chris HurtUniversity of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1206-8355
Angus WatsonUniversity of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
James TurvillYork and Scarborough Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, York, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3068-5015

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLower gastrointestinal symptoms attributed to colorectal disease are common. Early diagnosis of serious colorectal disease such as colorectal cancer (CRC), precancerous growths (polyps) and inflammation is important to ensure the best possible outcomes for a patient. The current 'gold standard' diagnostic test is colonoscopy. Colonoscopy is an invasive procedure. Some people struggle to cope with it and require intravenous sedation and/or analgesia. It is also resource-intensive, needing to be performed in specialist endoscopy units by a trained team. Across the UK, the demand for colonoscopy is outstripping capacity and the diagnosis of colorectal disease is being delayed. A colon capsule endoscope (CCE) is an alternative colorectal diagnostic. It is a 'camera in a pill' that can be swallowed and which passes through the gastrointestinal tract, obtaining visual images on the colon. There is now established experience of CCE in the UK. CCE might provide a less invasive method to diagnose colorectal disease if found to be accurate and effective and provide a means by which to increase the National Health Service (NHS) diagnostic capacity. AIMS AND

objectivesThe aim of this study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of CCE when compared with colonoscopy in representative and clinically meaningful cohorts of patients. An evaluation of the experiences of CCE for the patient and clinical team and an assessment of cost effectiveness will be undertaken.

methodsWe will undertake three research workstreams (WS). In WS1, we shall perform a paired (back-to-back) study. Each participant will swallow the CCE and then later on the same day they will have a colonoscopy. The study has been designed in collaboration with our Patient Advisory Group and as closely mirrors standard care as is possible. 973 participants will be recruited from three representative clinical contexts; suspected CRC, suspected inflammatory bowel disease and postpolypectomy surveillance. Up to 30 sites across the UK will be involved to maximise inclusivity. Measures of diagnostic accuracy will be reported along with CCE completion rates, number of colonoscopy procedures potentially prevented and adverse events, such as capsule retention. A nested substudy of intraobserver and interobserver agreement will be performed. WS2 will develop models of cost-effectiveness and WS3 will evaluate the patient and clinician experience, with reference to acceptability and choice. ANTICIPATED IMPACT: The study findings will provide the evidence base to inform future colorectal diagnostic services. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has approval from the North East-Tyne and Wear South research ethics committee (REC reference 24/NE/0178, IRAS 331349). The findings will be disseminated to the NHS, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, other clinical stakeholders and participants, patients and the public. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN16126290.

Indexed as

Capsule EndoscopyColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleSensitivity and SpecificityUnited KingdomClinical TrialColorectal surgeryEndoscopyGASTROENTEROLOGYPatients

Identifiers

PMID41027693
PMCPMC12506084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.