ArticleBMJ open2025
The effects of oliceridine and sufentanil on postoperative nausea and vomiting in abdominal surgery (EOSPONVAS): protocol for a multicentre, two-arm, randomised controlled trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Oliceridine versus sufentanil: a systematic review and meta-analysis of postoperative nausea and vomiting.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Pooled it
- Impact of oliceridine versus sufentanil on postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing thyroid surgery: a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.Annals of medicine · 2026Trial
- Comparison of hemodynamic responses to endotracheal intubation with oliceridine and sufentanil during induction: a randomized controlled trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Trial
- Effects of oliceridine-based patient-controlled intravenous administration on postoperative pain and hemodynamic stability in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOliceridine is a novel μ-opioid receptor selective agonist that provides analgesia while reducing μ-receptor-mediated adverse effects such as postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). Evidence in abdominal surgery remains limited. This study aims to determine whether oliceridine reduces PONV and improves recovery in abdominal surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective, multicentre, two-arm, randomised trial. Participants aged 18-65 years, with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III and a body mass index of 18.5-23.9 kg/m², undergoing elective major abdominal surgery, will be eligible for inclusion. Gynaecological surgeries are excluded. All patients must require postoperative intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCIA) and give written consent. 494 participants will be randomised to oliceridine group or sufentanil group. The primary outcome is the incidence of PONV within 48 hours postsurgery. Secondary outcomes include vomiting frequency, nausea severity score, use of rescue antiemetics, resting numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score, Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score, time to first postoperative flatus, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS and PCIA metrics (effective attempts and total volume used). Safety outcomes include other opioid-related adverse effects (ORAEs) (eg, respiratory depression, pruritus, dizziness, headache), complications related to PONV (eg, electrolyte disturbances, wound dehiscence) and other perioperative complications. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol was approved (Version V3.0, 2025-01-14) by the Ethics Committee of Changhai Hospital (CHEC-2025-069), the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Centre (2025-S024-01) and the Wusong Central Hospital of Baoshan District, Shanghai (2025-17-01). It complies with the Declaration of Helsinki. Results will be shared via conferences and peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ID: ChiCTR2400089262).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.