ArticleTranslational behavioral medicine2025
Using document analysis methods and implementation science frameworks to conduct a process evaluation of the community asthma program on the Navajo Nation.
Article in Translational behavioral medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03377647 (An Asthma Collaboration to Reduce Childhood Asthma Disparities on the Navajo Nation), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Asthma Collaboration to Reduce Childhood Asthma Disparities on the Navajo Nation
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAsthma affects approximately 8.2% of United States school-aged children, with a significantly higher prevalence among socioeconomically disadvantaged minority children. Among Diné (Navajo) children living on the Navajo Nation, asthma rates exceed 20%. The community asthma program (CAP) was developed in partnership with the Navajo Nation following a year-long community engagement process. CAP is a 7-year, multicomponent, evidence-based intervention designed to improve asthma management within Indian Health Service facilities and Diné K-12 schools. PURPOSE: This study evaluates CAP's implementation processes and outcomes using document analysis, guided by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) and Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) frameworks. We describe our data sources, coding methods, and their contributions to understanding implementation, as well as discuss strengths, limitations, and implications for process evaluation.
methodsCAP research documents were collected from the 2017 community engagement period through the intervention's conclusion in 2023. When COVID-19 limited access to implementation settings, additional data sources, including email correspondence and meeting minutes, were analyzed using document analysis to examine activities, experiences, and attitudes related to CAP implementation.
resultsMultiple data sources, including RE-AIM forms, staff interviews, and research team documents, identified key process indicators and explanatory factors. While these sources provided valuable context, system- and provider-level fidelity indicators are needed to fully assess intervention reach and quality.
conclusionsFindings underscore the importance of collecting process data throughout implementation and leveraging diverse data sources to capture the local implementation context comprehensively. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: The Clinical Trials Registration # NCT03377647.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.