Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41027681›Full record

ArticleBMJ open quality2025

Use of WHO quality assessment/quality improvement tool for maternal and newborn care for gap analysis and POCQI methodology to improve preterm neonatal outcomes at a tertiary care centre: a quality improvement initiative.

Kiran Suthar, Sushma Nangia, Pratima Anand, Harish Pemde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kiran Suthar *Department of Neonatology, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, New Delhi, India.
Sushma NangiaDepartment of Neonatology, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, New Delhi, India drsnangia@gmail.com.
Pratima Anand *Department of Neonatology, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-0437-6529
Harish PemdePaediatrics, Lady Hardinge Medical College, New Delhi, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPreterm birth is a leading cause of neonatal mortality and morbidity globally. Evidence suggests that over three-quarters of premature deaths can be prevented through cost-effective interventions. However, compliance with evidence-based guidelines in neonatal care often falls <50%, even in well-resourced settings. AIMS AND

objectivesThe study evaluated system gaps using WHO Quality Assessment/Quality Improvement Tool for Maternal and Newborn Care (WHO QA/QI MN) and implemented Point of Care Quality Improvement (POCQI) methodology to improve and sustain the composite outcome of mortality and/or major morbidities, including bronchopulmonary dysplasia, necrotising enterocolitis stage 3, late-onset sepsis and intraventricular haemorrhage grade ≥3. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study was conducted over 14 months. The adapted WHO QA/QI MN tool and POCQI methodology were used to focus on key clinical practices, namely, kangaroo mother care (KMC), use of mother's own milk (MoM) and antibiotic usage, utilising multiple plan-do-study-act cycles.

resultsAmong 961 preterm neonates enrolled, KMC rates increased from 70.25% to 85.58%, and exclusive MoM use by day 7 increased from 59.24% to 70.2%. Antibiotic use declined from 25.5% to 20.67%. While process improvements were noted, the composite outcome of mortality and major morbidities did not show statistically significant reduction; however, a decreasing trend was observed post-intervention.

conclusionThis study demonstrates the feasibility of using the WHO tool by trained personnel for gap analysis. POCQI is an important approach to enhance evidence-based care practices and sustain good outcomes for preterm neonates in resource-limited settings. A longer follow-up may be needed to observe significant improvements in clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Quality Assurance, Health CareQuality ImprovementFemaleHumansInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMalePregnancyTertiary Care CentersWorld Health OrganizationPaediatricsPDSAQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID41027681
PMCPMC12481286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.