ArticleFamily medicine and community health2025
Referrals to allied health professionals for people with dementia: an analysis of general practitioner data from two Australian primary health networks.
Article in Family medicine and community health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Primary care determinants for timely diagnosis of dementia.Family medicine and community health · 2026Article
- Stroke incidence trends and the role of chronic disease management in a universal health coverage system: a retrospective observational study in Macao, 2019-2024.Family medicine and community health · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo examine general practitioners' (GPs) referral patterns to allied health services for people with dementia compared with those without dementia across two large Australian Primary Health Networks (PHNs).
designA retrospective cohort study using routinely collected general practice data. Logistic regression was used to compare odds of allied health referrals, adjusting for age, sex and socioeconomic status.
settingDe-identified patient and episode activity data from 537 GP practices across two PHNs in Australia between 2018 and 2023.
participantsData from 1 153 304 patients and 28 667 517 GP episodes of care were analysed. After merging records, 693 328 unique patients were identified, including 16 610 patients with dementia. Subcohorts included patients with dementia, stroke, Parkinson's disease and combinations of these conditions.
resultsThe dementia cohort (n=16 610) had a similar overall allied health referral rate (36.1%) to the control cohort (n=48 977) (35.4%). Patients with dementia only were significantly less likely to receive any allied health referral compared with those with stroke (adjusted OR (aOR) 0.76, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.80; p<0.001) or Parkinson's disease (aOR 0.72, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.78; p<0.001). Those with dementia and stroke were also less likely to receive referrals than those with stroke only (aOR 0.71, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.82; p<0.001). No significant difference was found between dementia with Parkinson's and Parkinson's only groups (p=0.48). Patients with dementia were consistently less likely to be referred to key allied health services (p<0.05).
conclusionDespite strong evidence supporting allied health interventions for dementia, referral rates remain comparatively low. Enhancing GP referral resources and education, integrating dementia-specific care pathways and implementing supportive policy changes are needed to improve access and equity in dementia care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.