ArticleJournal of pediatric psychology2026
Siblings of young children with congenital heart disease: parent perspectives from a crowdsourcing study.
Article in Journal of pediatric psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Supporting siblings of children with chronic medical conditions: a systematic review.Journal of pediatric psychology · 2026Article
- Rethinking cardiac neurodevelopment: a dimensional model of adversity in congenital heart disease.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo gather parents' perspectives on the experiences of siblings of young children with congenital heart disease (CHD), the impact of CHD on siblings, and the types of resources and supports they need to adjust to CHD within their family.
methodsA community advisory council guided the study. Parents of children with CHD, currently 1-7 years old, who had surgery in their first year of life, were eligible for participation if they were fluent in written English and had internet access. Recruitment through several CHD-specific nonprofit organizations produced a national sample of parents (N = 108). Of the 73 who had non-bereaved heart-healthy children, 59 (81%) provided sibling-relevant data for this study. Most parents were non-Hispanic White (n = 54; 91.5%) mothers (n = 41; 69.5%; Mage = 36.10; SDage = 5.0) reporting on siblings older than the child with CHD (n = 44; 74.6%). Data were qualitative, collected through crowdsourcing, and coded to distill themes.
resultsThree themes emerged: (1) CHD directly affects siblings' psychosocial functioning and daily activities, (2) CHD alters roles and relationships within the family, with impacts to siblings, and (3) families seek and appreciate support for heart-healthy siblings from extended family and friends, the healthcare team, and the community, but resources are variable.
conclusionParents described specific ways that CHD impacts their heart-healthy children, including their psychosocial functioning, role in the family, and support from the community. Findings highlight the need for family-centered care in CHD, including screening to identify siblings at risk for psychosocial difficulties and provision of appropriate supports to meet sibling and family needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.