ArticleClinical and experimental reproductive medicine2026
A comparison between the assisted reproductive technology outcomes of using two media during sperm microinjection: A bicarbonate medium (one-step) vs. a HEPES-buffered medium (SynVitro Flush).
Article in Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveHydroxyethyl piperazine ethane sulfonic acid (HEPES)-buffered media have long been employed in assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures; however, concerns persist regarding the impact of zwitterionic buffers on intrinsic cellular mechanisms. Limited studies have compared ART outcomes using bicarbonate media versus HEPES-buffered media during intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). This study compared the efficacy of two media used in ICSI: bicarbonate medium (one-step) and HEPES-buffered medium (SynVitro Flush).
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed data from 200 ICSI cycles performed in 2023. Metaphase II oocytes were allocated to a bicarbonate medium (SAGE 1-STEP; Origio) or a HEPES-buffered medium (SynVitro Flush) during the ICSI procedure. Outcomes including fertilization rate, embryo quality and development, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, miscarriage rate, and live birth rate were compared between the two groups.
resultsThe fertilization rate was significantly higher in the one-step medium (89.04%) than in the SynVitro medium (82.30%; p<0.001). The one-step medium also yielded more cleaved embryos and higher-quality blastocysts (class A/B; p<0.05). Consequently, more embryos were frozen in the one-step group (264 vs. 151), and higher embryo utilization rates were observed. Clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were significantly higher in the one-step group (p<0.05). No significant differences were found in chemical pregnancy rates or live birth rates among cycles utilizing frozen embryos (p>0.05). Additionally, there were no differences observed in miscarriage rates or multiple pregnancy rates.
conclusionThe one-step bicarbonate medium improved cycle efficiency during the ICSI procedure compared to the SynVitro Flush medium. This finding underscores the importance of selecting an appropriate medium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.