ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2025
Modulating vascular stresses through homeostatic remodelling: a multi-patient analysis of atherosclerotic carotid biomechanics.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The biomechanical behaviour of vascular tissues is influenced by the presence of residual stresses, yet their role in vascular adaptation to pathological conditions remains largely unexplored. These residual stresses may arise within the vessel wall as a result of growth and remodelling (G&R) processes governed by the principles of tensional homeostasis. This study extends our previous work by refining a computational workflow that integrates homeostasis-driven G&R into patient-specific carotid geometries. Key advancements include adopting a total Lagrangian framework to handle complex geometries, introducing novel post-processing metrics for improved comparisons and conducting statistical analyses to assess G&R's impact on biomechanical evaluations of atherosclerotic vessels. These improvements enabled the analysis of a cohort of 18 cases, incorporating patient-specific geometries and pathological tissue distributions reconstructed from clinical imaging data. Results suggest that G&R generally reduces peak stress, though its effectiveness depends on plaque morphology and tissue composition. High calcification leads to localized stress concentrations, limiting remodelling, whereas matrix-rich regions promote stress homogenization. At the cohort level, findings underscore the need for patient-specific analyses in plaque risk evaluation, reinforcing the importance of personalized biomechanical modelling in assessing atherosclerotic disease and guiding clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.