ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2025
Chronic pain prevalence and trends in urban, suburban, and rural areas among American adults aged 55+, 1998-2022.
Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rural-Urban Differences in the Impact of a Medicare Opioid Safety Policy on Beneficiaries with Disabilities.American journal of preventive medicine · 2026Article
- Differences in the use of pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatments among patients with chronic low back pain between 2017 and 2021: A cross-sectional study of commercial claims.The journal of pain · 2026Article
- Exploring chronic pain: demographic and social determinants of health insights in Maine.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rural-urban health disparities in the United States are large and persistent, yet most surveillance efforts focus on mortality and disability. Monitoring rural-urban trends in pain, a major but overlooked indicator of population health, remains understudied. Given changes in demographics and resources of urban, suburban, and rural areas since the turn of the 21st century, which may have altered place-based differences in pain prevalence. Using nationally representative data from the Health and Retirement Study of 35,230 adults aged 55 and older (n = 206,600 person-wave observations), we estimated pain prevalence and trends across urban, suburban, and rural areas from 1998 to 2022. We assessed variation by age, sex/gender, race and ethnicity, and census region. Over 24 years, pain prevalence increased by 70 % (Prevalence Ratio [PR] = 1.70, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.64, 1.75) and was consistently highest in rural areas and lowest in urban areas. However, pain prevalence rose most sharply in suburbs as compared to both rural and urban areas (suburban and time interaction vs. rural areas: PR = 1.08, 95 % CI: 1.00, 1.17). Suburban pain prevalence was similar to urban levels in 1998 but converged with that of rural levels by 2022. Stratified analyses revealed broadly similar patterns across demographic and regional groups, with particularly rapid increases among suburban populations in the South. These findings highlight nationwide increases in chronic pain, with suburban areas emerging as new "hotspots" alongside rural areas. Given that pain is a leading cause of disability and functional decline, monitoring place-based trends is essential for addressing this growing public health concern.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.