Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41027038›Full record

ArticleJournal of participatory medicine2025

Exploring Patient and Caregiver Perceptions of the Facilitators and Barriers to Patient Engagement in Research: Participatory Qualitative Study.

Sasha Melanda Kullman, Louise Bird, Amy Clark, Amanda Doherty-Kirby, Diana Ermel, Nathalie Kinnard, Marion Knutson, Andrew Milroy, Lesley Singer, Anna Maria Chudyk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of participatory medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sasha Melanda KullmanCollege of Pharmacy, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Apotex Centre, 750 McDermot Avenue West, Winnipeg, R3E 0T5, Canada, 1 204-474-9306.ORCID 0000-0003-4086-2097
Louise BirdPatient-Caregiver Partner, College of Pharmacy, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0009-0008-5816-7440
Amy ClarkPatient-Caregiver Partner, College of Pharmacy, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0009-0004-7570-4173
Amanda Doherty-KirbyPatient-Caregiver Partner, College of Pharmacy, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0009-0002-0411-8367
Diana ErmelPatient-Caregiver Partner, College of Pharmacy, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0009-0006-1196-2119
Nathalie KinnardPatient-Caregiver Partner, College of Pharmacy, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0009-0001-5202-4720
Marion KnutsonPatient-Caregiver Partner, College of Pharmacy, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0009-0005-6575-6196
Andrew MilroyPatient-Caregiver Partner, College of Pharmacy, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0009-0007-1076-8274
Lesley SingerPatient-Caregiver Partner, College of Pharmacy, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6910-5973
Anna Maria ChudykCollege of Pharmacy, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Apotex Centre, 750 McDermot Avenue West, Winnipeg, R3E 0T5, Canada, 1 204-474-9306.ORCID 0000-0001-8476-2093

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patient engagement in research is the meaningful and active involvement of patient and caregiver partners (ie, patients and their family or friends) in research priority-setting, conduct, and governance. With the proper support, patient and caregiver partners can inform every stage of the research cycle, but common barriers often prevent their full engagement. Objective: This participatory qualitative study aimed to answer the question: What are the facilitators and barriers to patient engagement experienced by patient and caregiver partners in a Canadian research context? Methods: Participants were N=13 patient and caregiver partners (median age 62 y, IQR 58-69 y; 11/13, 85% women; 13/13, 100% White) from 4 provinces who completed 60-90-minute semistructured videoconferencing interviews. The interviews were transcribed verbatim. A researcher and a patient partner reviewed the transcripts and curated a dataset of 90 participant quotations representing facilitators and barriers to patient engagement. This dataset was co-analyzed using participatory theme elicitation alongside 7 patient and caregiver partners with diverse identities who were not among the participants we interviewed and, therefore, contributed novel perspectives. Results: We generated four themes depicting factors that facilitate meaningful patient engagement alongside barriers that arise when these factors are not in place: (1) Co-defining roles and expectations; (2) demonstrating the value and impact of engagement; (3) psychological safety; and (4) community outreach, training, and education. We then discuss how barriers to enacting these 4 factors can be mitigated and provide a practical checklist of considerations for both researchers and patient and caregiver partners for engaging together throughout the research cycle. Conclusions: Research teams conducting patient and caregiver engagement activities should draw from our findings to mitigate barriers and facilitate meaningful engagement experiences.

Indexed as

co-analysisparticipatory researchpatient-oriented researchpatient partnershippublic and patient engagement

Identifiers

PMID41027038
PMCPMC12483476

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.