Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41027035›Full record

Observational studyJMIR formative research2025

AI-Enabled, Text-Based Health Coaching and Navigation for Employees to Support Health Outcomes: Pre-Post Observational Study.

Paula Wilbourne, Susan Mirch-Kretschmann, Denise Walker, Michael Varghese, Roberto Arnetoli

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Seven Desiderata for Ethical Frameworks for AI Mental Health Agents.The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paula Wilbourne *Sibly, Inc, 400 Concar Dr., San Mateo, CA, 94402, United States, +1 801 855 6493.ORCID 0000-0002-6078-6637
Susan Mirch-Kretschmann *VA Palo Alto Health Care, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Palo Alto, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9829-6193
Denise WalkerSchool of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3811-5239
Michael VargheseSibly, Inc, 400 Concar Dr., San Mateo, CA, 94402, United States, +1 801 855 6493.ORCID 0000-0001-9906-823X
Roberto ArnetoliSibly, Inc, 400 Concar Dr., San Mateo, CA, 94402, United States, +1 801 855 6493.ORCID 0000-0002-8241-7752

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Limited, timely access to quality mental health treatment harms well-being and quality of life while costing individuals and organizations millions in increased medical spending and reduced productivity. Too few qualified professionals, inconsistent quality, and stigma thwart traditional solutions, creating the need for scalable, science-based solutions. Objective: This report provides an overview of a novel digital health coaching service that consists of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted, human-delivered, text-based health coaching. This report provides data evaluating the efficacy of this service for delivering mental health support, improving well-being, and enhancing workplace productivity. Methods: This observational study analyzed operational and self-reported health data from employees of subscribing organizations who used Sibly's digital health coaching service. Data included response times, changes in expressed member sentiment, conversation topics, and adherence to motivational interviewing. A subset of members (n=38) provided pre-post self-reported assessment measures of distress, unhealthy days, and presenteeism, having engaged in at least 4 coaching conversations over a minimum of 14 days. Sentiment was evaluated using a natural language processing tool. Results: Sibly provided quick access to interactive human coaching, with a median response time of 132 seconds. Sentiment analysis showed that 57% (878/1540) of conversations increased in positive emotions. The coaches maintained strong fidelity to the techniques of motivational interviewing, with adherence exceeding 90% (387/430). The proportion of users reporting severe distress declined from 33.3% (10/30) at baseline to 6.7% (2/30) at follow-up, representing a 79% relative reduction (P<.001). Participants also reported a reduction in the number of unhealthy days per month, decreasing from 19.57 to 15.87 per month (P=.02). Self-reported productivity improved by 18% during the study period (P<.001). Additionally, 61% (47/77) of users who received referrals to additional employer-sponsored benefits engaged with those resources, demonstrating effective care navigation to relevant support services. Conclusions: This report provides an overview of novel mental health support and navigation services that use AI-enabled, text-based health coaching and care navigation. Data suggest that the services provide effective, scalable mental health support in workplace settings. The platform helped reduce distress, improve well-being, and boost productivity by offering immediate access to trained coaches and personalized guidance. These results are consistent with existing research on digital mental health services. They highlight the potential of AI-assisted coaching to improve access to care. Future research should include larger, diverse populations and more rigorous randomized controlled trials. This formative report provides data that describes and demonstrates a proof of concept for an innovative technology-enabled service that addresses the problems of scalability, access, quality, and stigma that challenge the provision of traditional mental health services.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMentoringText MessagingAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedWorkplaceaccessartificial intelligencebehavioraldigital mental healthhealth coachinginterviewingmachine learningproof of conceptquality of lifescalability

Identifiers

PMID41027035
PMCPMC12500221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.