Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41027025›Full record

SynthesisJMIR mental health2025

Speech Emotion Recognition in Mental Health: Systematic Review of Voice-Based Applications.

Eric Jordan, Raphaël Terrisse, Valeria Lucarini, Motasem Alrahabi, Marie-Odile Krebs, Julien Desclés, Christophe Lemey

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JMIR mental health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eric JordanObTIC, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID 0009-0007-4145-6433
Raphaël TerrisseURCI Mental Health Department, Brest Medical University Hospital, Brest, France.ORCID 0009-0004-5864-2679
Valeria LucariniUniversité Paris Cité, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM U1266, team "Pathophysiology of Psychiatric disorders :Development and Vulnerability", Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3553-8818
Motasem AlrahabiObTIC, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5478-4283
Marie-Odile KrebsUniversité Paris Cité, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM U1266, team "Pathophysiology of Psychiatric disorders :Development and Vulnerability", Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4715-9890
Julien DesclésUniversité Paris Cité, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), INSERM U1266, team "Pathophysiology of Psychiatric disorders :Development and Vulnerability", Paris, France.ORCID 0009-0007-3984-4760
Christophe LemeyURCI Mental Health Department, Brest Medical University Hospital, Brest, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7308-7958

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe field of speech emotion recognition (SER) encompasses a wide variety of approaches, with artificial intelligence technologies providing improvements in recent years. In the domain of mental health, the links between individuals' emotional states and pathological diagnoses are of particular interest.

objectiveThis study aimed to investigate the performance of tools combining SER and artificial intelligence approaches with a view to their use within clinical contexts and to determine the extent to which SER technologies have already been applied within clinical contexts.

methodsThe review includes studies applied to speech (audio) signals for a select set of pathologies or disorders and only includes those studies that evaluate diagnostic performance using machine learning performance metrics or statistical correlation measures. The PubMed, IEEE Xplore, arXiv, and ScienceDirect databases were queried as recently as February 2025. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool was used to measure the risk of bias.

resultsA total of 14 articles were included in the final review. The included papers addressed suicide risk (3/14, 21%), depression (8/14, 57%), and psychotic disorders (3/14, 21%).

conclusionsSER technologies are mostly used indirectly in mental health research and in a wide variety of ways, including different architectures, datasets, and pathologies. This diversity makes a direct assessment of the technology challenging. Nonetheless, promising results are obtained in various studies that attempt to diagnose patients based on either indirect or direct results from SER models. These results highlight the potential for this technology to be used within a clinical setting. Future work should focus on how clinicians can use these technologies collaboratively.

trial registrationPROSPERO CRD420251006669; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251006669.

Indexed as

EmotionsMental DisordersMental HealthSpeechArtificial IntelligenceHumansaffective computingmachine learningmental healthpsychiatrypsychologyspeech emotion recognitionvoice

Identifiers

PMID41027025
PMCPMC12521853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.